| Matter of Riguzzi v DiNapoli |
| 2011 NY Slip Op 02106 [82 AD3d 1484] |
| March 24, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| In the Matter of Rosanne M. Riguzzi, Petitioner, v ThomasP. DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, Respondent. |
—[*1] Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), forrespondent.
Lahtinen, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of theSupreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which deniedpetitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner, a police officer for the Westchester County Department of Public Safety,sustained a work-related, accidental injury to her right shoulder in 1994. She thereafterperformed a light duty assignment in the department's civil division, dealing with theenforcement of civil judgments and orders. Specifically, petitioner worked at the division'soffice, where she completed clerical tasks and interacted with the public. After petitioner's 2005application for accidental disability retirement benefits was disapproved, she sought a hearingand redetermination, following which a Hearing Officer found that she was not permanentlyincapacitated from performing her limited duties. Respondent accepted the Hearing Officer'sfindings and denied petitioner's application, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
As substantial evidence supports respondent's determination that petitioner was not [*2]permanently incapacitated from performing her light dutyassignment, we confirm.[FN*]Petitioner's assignment was administrative in nature and, contrary to her contention, respondentappropriately determined that her duties did not include single-handedly restraining any membersof the public who became combative in the division's office (see Matter of O'Halpin v New York State Comptroller, 12 AD3d771, 772 [2004], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]; Matter of Glaski v Regan,115 AD2d 111, 111-112 [1985]). Respondent was further free to credit the opinion of anorthopedic surgeon who examined petitioner and found her to be fully capable of performing heractual duties (see Matter of Riguzzi vHevesi, 16 AD3d 822, 823 [2005]; Matter of Field v Regan, 90 AD2d 580[1982], lv denied 58 NY2d 608 [1983]).
Spain, J.P., Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed,without costs, and petition dismissed.
Footnote *: Petitioner concedes thatrespondent appropriately assessed her application in terms of her ability to perform her presentassignment (see 2 NYCRR 364.3 [b]).