People v Capone
2018 NY Slip Op 02684 [160 AD3d 1221]
April 19, 2018
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 30, 2018


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Aaron T. Capone, Appellant.

Rural Law Center of New York, Castleton (Cynthia Feathers of counsel), for appellant.

Gary M. Pasqua, District Attorney, Canton (Matthew L. Peabody of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeals (1) from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.),rendered August 17, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime ofaggravated driving while intoxicated, and (2) from a judgment of said court (Champagne, J.),rendered October 11, 2016, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence ofimprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated driving while intoxicated and waived his right toappeal. After successfully completing a period of interim probation, County Court (Richards, J.)sentenced defendant to five years of probation. Thereafter, defendant admitted to violating acondition of his probation by consuming alcohol. County Court (Champagne, J.) then revokeddefendant's probation and resentenced him to 1 to 3 years in prison followed by three years ofconditional discharge. Defendant appeals from both judgments.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the negotiated resentence was harsh andexcessive.[FN*] Wedisagree. Given defendant's acknowledgment that he repeatedly consumed alcohol while onprobation, his lengthy criminal history and that the agreed-upon sentence was the statutoryminimum prison term (see Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [e]; [3] [b]), we find no[*2]extraordinary circumstances or any abuse of discretionwarranting a reduction of the resentence in the interest of justice (see People v Woodruff, 136 AD3d1073, 1074 [2016]; People vBrand, 100 AD3d 1154, 1154 [2012]).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgmentsare affirmed.

Footnotes


Footnote *:Defendant's original waiver ofthe right to appeal does not preclude his challenge to the resentence (see People v Middlemiss, 149 AD3d1421, 1422 n [2017]).


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.