Russell v Zaccaria
2004 NYSlipOp 04310
June 1, 2004
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Tuesday, January 11, 2005


Anna R. Russell et al., Plaintiffs,
v
Peter Zaccaria et al., Defendants, and Russell Zaccaria, Respondent. Lloyd D. Feld, Nonparty Appellant.

[*1]

In two related actions, inter alia, for an accounting, the nonparty Lloyd D. Feld appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), entered February 23, 2001, which denied his petition to impose a lien pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the nonparty appellant was not entitled to a lien pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475, as he failed to show that he was an attorney of record for the defendant Russell Zaccaria (see Judiciary Law § 475; Rodriguez v City of New York, 66 NY2d 825, 827 [1985]; D'Amico v Nuzzo, 138 AD2d 667, 668 [1988]; Matter of Barnum v Srogi, 96 AD2d 723 [1983]; Melzer v 195 Broadway Corp., 18 AD2d 1108 [1963]; Matter of Sebring, 238 App Div 281 [1933]).

We note that except to the extent that the Supreme Court's findings were necessary [*2]to determine whether Lloyd D. Feld was an attorney of record for Russell Zaccaria, the parties are not bound by the court's remaining findings. Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.