Wagman v Wagman
2004 NYSlipOp 04319
June 1, 2004
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004


Joel Wagman, Respondent,
v
Jacqueline B. Wagman, Appellant.

[*1]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 16, 1996, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), dated January 7, 2003, which granted the plaintiff's motion for an award of an attorney's fee.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

A party may recover an attorney's fee from an adversary spouse where there is substantial compliance with 22 NYCRR 1400.3 (see Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 285 AD2d 587 [2001]; Flanagan v Flanagan, 267 AD2d 80 [1999]). In this case, the award of counsel fees was improper. The retainer agreement was not filed with the court until the making of this motion and, therefore, the plaintiff's counsel did not substantially comply with 22 NYCRR 1400.3. In any event, although 22 NYCRR 1400.1 required the plaintiff's counsel to render a written bill at least every 60 days, there is no evidence that any bill was rendered and none was submitted in support of the motion for an amount of an attorney's fee. This failure alone warrants the denial of the motion (see Julien v Machson, 245 AD2d 122 [1997]; Kaplowitz v Newman, 185 Misc 2d 205 [2000]).

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.