People v Nurse
2004 NYSlipOp 04363
June 1, 2004
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Bernard Nurse, Appellant.

[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered February 21, 2002, convicting him of burglary in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's request to proceed pro se after conducting an adequate inquiry as to whether the decision to waive the right to counsel was made intelligently and voluntarily (see People v Johnson, 120 AD2d 816 [1986]). Indeed, we are satisfied by the defendant's responses to the Supreme Court's inquiry that his true motivation for making the request was to delay the trial.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court did not assume the role of prosecutor when it questioned the defendant at his second felony offender hearing. The Supreme Court's questions were properly aimed at developing significant facts and clarifying confusing issues (see People v Arnold, 98 NY2d 63, 67 [2002]; People v De Jesus, 42 NY2d 519, 523 [1977]). Thus, the defendant was not denied his right to an unbiased factfinder. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.