People v Tyes
2004 NYSlipOp 05950
July 9, 2004
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 22, 2004


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Tyes, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered July 1, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his unrestricted waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his present contention regarding the severity of the sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). In any event, the bargained-for sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Contrary to defendant's further contention, the record does not establish that Supreme Court was unaware that it had the ability to exercise its discretion in determining whether to impose a lesser period of postrelease supervision (cf. People v Stanley, 309 AD2d 1254 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.