Chizh v Hillside Campus Meadows Assoc., LLC
2004 NYSlipOp 06456
Decided on August 31, 2004
Court of Appeals
As corrected through Thursday, September 16, 2004


Decided on August 31, 2004
No. 165 SSM 24

[*1]Aleksey Chizh, Appellant,

v

Hillside Campus Meadows Associates, LLC, Respondent.





Submitted by Emily L. Downing, for appellant.
Submitted by John Wallace, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Unlike the situation in Prats v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. (100 NY2d 878 [2003]), [*2]here plaintiff was replacing a torn window screen at the time of his injury, an activity that constituted "routine maintenance" rather than "repair" or "alteration" of a building or structure (see Esposito v New York City Indus. Dev. Agency, 1 NY3d 526 [2003]; see also Abbatiello v Lancaster Studio Assoc., 2004 NY Slip Op 05766, at 8 [7-1-04]).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and Smith concur.
Decided August 31, 2004


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.