Oyebola v Makuch
2004 NYSlipOp 06486
September 7, 2004
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, November 10, 2004


Olawunmi Oyebola, Appellant,
v
Roman Makuch et al., Respondents.

[*1]In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated July 10, 2003, which, inter alia, denied that branch of her motion which was to vacate an order of the same court dated February 26, 2003, which, upon her default in opposing the motion, granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To warrant vacatur of an order entered on default, a plaintiff must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default in opposing a defendant's motion and a meritorious cause of action (see Beale v Yepes, 309 AD2d 886 [2003]). Here, the plaintiff failed to establish that her claim of serious injury was meritorious.

In light of the forgoing, we need not reach the plaintiff's remaining contention. Smith, J.P., S. Miller, Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.