Putter v Feldman
2004 NYSlipOp 08944
December 2, 2004
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005


Lloyd Putter, Appellant,
v
Richard B. Feldman et al., Respondents.

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered July 15, 2003, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss plaintiff's causes of action for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, with leave to replead, and plaintiff's claims for punitive damages, without leave to replead, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff's claim for fraudulent concealment was properly dismissed, with leave to replead, for failure to allege all of the required elements of such a claim (see P.T. Bank Cent. Asia v ABN AMRO Bank, 301 AD2d 373, 376 [2003]). Plaintiff's claim for breach of fiduciary duty was properly dismissed, with leave to replead, for failure to allege facts showing that defendants' representation of certain interests was substantially related to their prior representation of plaintiff (see Solow v Grace & Co., 83 NY2d 303, 308 [1994]). Plaintiff's demand for punitive damages was properly dismissed, without leave to replead, for failure to allege facts showing willful, wanton and reckless misconduct (see Giblin v Murphy, 73 NY2d 769, 772 [1988]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and Friedman, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.