Matter of Charles v Selsky
2004 NYSlipOp 09354
December 16, 2004
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005


In the Matter of Gerald Charles, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[*1]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit altering an authorized item and possession of a weapon. According to the misbehavior report, a metal nail file imbedded in a pen and sticking out about three quarters of an inch was found in petitioner's locker. The fact that the contraband was found in an area within petitioner's control gives rise to an inference that the weapon belonged to him (see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 7 AD3d 901 [2004]; Matter of Alston v Goord, 4 AD3d 708, 709 [2004]). This inference, together with the misbehavior report, picture of the altered pen and testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Cummings v Goord, 10 AD3d 748 [2004]; Matter of Davis v Senkowski, 306 AD2d 778 [2003]). Petitioner's contention that the pen did not belong to him presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Cummings v Goord, supra).[*2]

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.