Lowy v Bobker
2005 NYSlipOp 01327
February 22, 2005
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, April 20, 2005


Rudolph J. Lowy et al., Appellants,
v
Eli Bobker et al., Respondents.

[*1]In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust and to set aside the sale of a certain piece of real property as a fraudulent conveyance, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated October 1, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of showing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any triable issue of fact. Since the plaintiffs' proof was insufficient, the motion for summary judgment was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.