People v Ortiz
2005 NYSlipOp 02124
March 18, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 18, 2005


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddie Ortiz, Appellant.

[*1]

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H. Fandrich, J.), rendered September 23, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate (Penal Law former § 240.32), defendant contends that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see CPL 30.20; see generally People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 444-445 [1975]). The preindictment delay of 10 months is not unreasonable, and defendant's conclusory allegations of prejudice are otherwise insufficient to support that contention (see People v Beyah, 302 AD2d 981 [2003], lv denied 99 NY2d 626 [2003]). The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.