People v Sacco
2005 NYSlipOp 02693
April 7, 2005
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, June 22, 2005


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Sacco, Appellant.

[*1]Carpinello, J. Appeal from an order of the County Court of Columbia County (Nichols, J.), entered January 20, 2004, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

We reject defendant's contention that he was improperly classified as a risk level III sex offender prior to his release from prison on convictions of rape in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child. Defendant's prior felony conviction of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree presumptively placed him in the risk level III category (see e.g People v Boan, 11 AD3d 956 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 702 [2004]; People v Scott, 288 AD2d 763, 764 [2001]). Moreover, County Court considered defendant's extensive criminal history, the facts surrounding his recent convictions and the conditions of his then impending release, factors which alone justified the classification (see People v Scott, supra at 764-765). In short, County Court's determination is supported by clear and convincing evidence and will not be disturbed (see id. at 765).

Defendant's remaining contention regarding the timing of his assignment of counsel has been considered and is unpersuasive.[*2]

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.