People v Gomez
2005 NYSlipOp 03685
May 2, 2005
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, July 20, 2005


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Juan Carlos Gomez, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered January 10, 2001, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (four counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the totality of the evidence, the law, and circumstances of the case, we conclude that the defendant received meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]). Unsuccessful trial strategies and mere losing tactics do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563 [2000]; People v Benevento, supra). The defense counsel presented a vigorous defense and effectively cross-examined witnesses (see People v Wright, 8 AD3d 507 [2004]).

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.