People v Burgos
2005 NYSlipOp 04052
May 16, 2005
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, July 20, 2005


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jose M. Burgos, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered April 9, 2002, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (three counts), aggravated sexual abuse in the third degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.