People v Sutton
2005 NYSlipOp 04759
June 10, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 24, 2005


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Sutton, Appellant.

[*1]

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), entered November 13, 2003. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in determining that he is a level three risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). The record establishes that defendant engaged in a continuous course of sexual misconduct and did not complete treatment because of a disciplinary problem. Consequently, we conclude that the court's determination is supported by clear and convincing evidence (see generally § 168-n [3]; People v Barnwell, 6 AD3d 1146, 1147 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 604 [2004]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.