Mazza v Marcello
2005 NYSlipOp 06102
July 25, 2005
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 21, 2005


Thomas Mazza, Plaintiff,
v
Robert Marcello, Defendant. Donald Friedman, P.C., Nonparty Appellant; Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, Nonparty Respondent.

[*1]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Donald Friedman, P.C., the plaintiff's attorney, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Aliotta, J.), dated July 23, 2004, which granted the motion of Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, the plaintiff's former attorney, to determine an attorney's fee for legal services rendered by Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, and directed it to pay Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, the sum of $8,929.60, representing 40% of the total attorney's fee of $22,324.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The issue of apportionment of an attorney's fee is controlled by the circumstances and equities of each particular case, and the trial court is in the best position to assess such factors (see Juste v New York City Tr. Auth., 5 AD3d 736 [2004]; Ebrahimian v Long Is. R.R., 269 AD2d 488 [2000]). Contrary to the appellant's contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the former attorney 40% of the total legal fee, as such fee was based upon the amount of time spent on the case, and the nature of the work performed. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Cozier and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.