People v Smith
2005 NYSlipOp 06230
August 1, 2005
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, October 12, 2005


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Anzel Smith, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Cotter, J.), rendered May 10, 2002, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), resisting arrest, obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and violations of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1163 (d) and 1180 (a), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the People's remarks on summation constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review. The defendant either failed to object to the remarks, made only a general objection, or moved belatedly for a mistrial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Malave, 7 AD3d 542 [2004]; People v White, 5 AD3d 511 [2004]; People v Williams [Sean], 305 AD2d 703 [2003]; People v Jones, 294 AD2d 517 [2002]). In any event, the challenged remarks either were fair comment on the evidence, permissive rhetorical comment, or responsive to the defense counsel's summation (see People v Filipe, 7 AD3d 539 [2004]; cf. People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105 [1976]). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.