Matter of Jenkins v McKinney
2005 NYSlipOp 06512
August 22, 2005
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, October 12, 2005


In the Matter of Russell Jenkins, Appellant,
v
Denise McKinney, Respondent.

[*1]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richardson, J.), dated October 25, 2004, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Borofsky, S.M.), dated September 21, 2004, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition, without prejudice, for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father's objection to the order of the Support Magistrate. Contrary to the father's contention, a court cannot reduce or annul child support arrears accrued before the making of an application to modify child support (see Family Ct Act § 451; Miller v Miller, 308 AD2d 541 [2003]; O'Connor v Curcio, 281 AD2d 100, 102 [2001]; Howfield v Howfield, 250 AD2d 573 [1998]; Matter of McCaffrey v McCaffrey, 134 AD2d 430, 431 [1987]). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.