Reiss v Reiss
2005 NYSlipOp 06912
September 26, 2005
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, November 16, 2005


Ronald Reiss, Appellant,
v
Stella Reiss, Respondent.

[*1]In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), dated May 27, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate the parties' post-nuptial agreement, and granted that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was to enforce that agreement only to the extent of directing the parties to submit papers on the issue of counsel fees.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as granted that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was to enforce the post-nuptial agreement to the extent of directing the parties to submit papers on the issue of counsel fees is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.

We dismiss the appeal from so much of the order as granted that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was to enforce the post-nuptial agreement only to the extent of directing the parties to submit papers on the issue of counsel fees. That portion of the order did not determine the cross motion and does not affect a substantial right; thus, it is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; Matter of James, 5 AD3d 487, 488 [2004]), and leave to appeal has not been granted.[*2]

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion to vacate the parties' post-nuptial agreement. Viewing the challenged agreement in its entirety, and examining the totality of the circumstances in this case, we find that the agreement is not unconscionable (see Christian v Christian, 42 NY2d 63 [1977]; Chambers v McIntyre, 5 AD3d 344 [2004]; Golfinopoulos v Golfinopoulos, 144 AD2d 537, 538 [1988]; Juliani v Juliani, 143 AD2d 72, 75 [1988]).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.