Leyse v Flagship Capital Servs. Corp.
2005 NYSlipOp 08001
October 27, 2005
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Friday March 31, 2006


Robert Scott Leyse, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v
Flagship Capital Services Corp. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered October 18, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants-respondents' motion to dismiss plaintiff's class action claims, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff in this putative class action seeks statutory damages and injunctive relief for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 USC § 227). The motion court correctly dismissed the class action allegations and associated claims for class action relief since there is no statutory authorization for class recovery under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (see CPLR 901 [b]; Rudgayzer & Gratt v Cape Canaveral Tour & Travel, Inc., 22 AD3d 148 [2005]; Ganci v Cape Canaveral Tour & Travel, Inc., 21 AD3d 399 [2005]; Weber v Rainbow Software, Inc., 21 AD3d 411 [2005]; Bonime v Discount Funding Assoc., Inc., 21 AD3d 393 [2005]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.