People v Robb
2005 NYSlipOp 08524
November 10, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 18, 2006


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian L. Robb, Appellant.

[*1]

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd, J.), rendered October 30, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sodomy in the second degree (three counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of three counts of sodomy in the second degree (Penal Law former § 130.45). Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court properly admitted the victim's testimony relating to charges of sexual abuse against defendant that had been dismissed. That testimony " 'was inextricably interwoven with the evidence of the charged crime, it was necessary to comprehend that evidence . . . and its probative worth exceeded its prejudicial effect' " (People v Pepe, 259 AD2d 949, 950 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 1024 [1999], quoting People v Stephens, 181 AD2d 996, 997 [1992], lv denied 80 NY2d 934 [1992]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.