Farrington v Heidkamp
2006 NYSlipOp 01455
February 28, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, April 19, 2006


Karen A. Farrington, Respondent,
v
Kenneth K. Heidkamp et al., Defendants, and Thomas J. Brennan, Appellant.

[*1]In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Thomas J. Brennan appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered April 6, 2005, which denied, as untimely, his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a determination of the motion on the merits.

Contrary to the conclusion of the Supreme Court, the motion for summary judgment was timely served. The note of issue filed on July 19, 2003, was vacated when the case was removed from the trial calendar on September 21, 2004 (see Alexander v City of New York, 277 AD2d 334 [2000]; Bono v Barzallo, 260 AD2d 592 [1999]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.