People v Prendergast
2006 NYSlipOp 01650
March 7, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 17, 2006


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
John Prendergast, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), rendered January 6, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered January 6, 2003, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor's cross-examination of his alibi witness concerning her failure to testify before the grand jury. However, the defendant abandoned this argument (see People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024 [1995]; People v Valentine, 271 AD2d 245 [2000]), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.