People v Martinez
2006 NYSlipOp 02219
March 21, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 17, 2006


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Edward Martinez, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered April 16, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's arguments regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation are without merit. The challenged remarks constituted fair comment on the evidence (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105 [1976]), were responsive to arguments presented in the defense counsel's summation (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396 [1981]; People v Baker, 251 AD2d 592 [1998]), or were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.