Benitez v Olson
2006 NY Slip Op 03522
Decided on May 2, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 2, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
MARK C. DILLON, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER

2005-02704

[*1]Ever S. Benitez, a/k/a Ebert S. Benitez, etc., plaintiff- appellant-respondent,

v

Diane Olson, defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant-respondent, et al., defendants; National Waste Disposal Corp., et al., third-party defendants/ second third-party defendants-respondents; Town of Islip, defendant second third-party plaintiff-respondent. (Index No. 30368/00)





Martin Silver, P.C. (Stock & Carr, Mineola, N.Y. [Victor A. Carr]
of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant-respondent.
Nicolini, Paradise, Ferretti & Sabella, Mineola, N.Y. (John R.
Ferretti of counsel), for defendant
third-party plaintiff-appellant-
respondent (no brief filed).
Ahmuty, Demers & McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Brendan T.
Fitzpatrick of counsel), for third-party
defendants/second third-party
defendants-respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated March 1, 2005, which granted the motion of the third-party defendants/second third-party defendants for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaints, and the defendant third-party plaintiff separately appeals from the same order.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal by the plaintiff must be dismissed as he is not aggrieved by the order (see CPLR 5511; Gwyn v 575 Fifth Ave. Assoc., 12 AD3d 403, 404; Bentzinger v Host Marriot Corp., 6 AD3d 562; Johnson v Leach Co., 5 AD3d 735).[*2]

The separate appeal by the defendant third-party plaintiff must be dismissed as she did not submit papers in opposition to the underlying motion which resulted in the order appealed from. No appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511; Viggiani v Grodotzke, 306 AD2d 273, 274).
MILLER, J.P., SPOLZINO, LIFSON and DILLON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.