Trevett v City of Little Falls
2006 NYSlipOp 03623
May 9, 2006
Court of Appeals
As corrected through Wednesday, June 28, 2006


[*1]
Dan Trevett, Individually and as Parent and Legal Guardian of Adam Trevett, an Infant, Appellant,
v
City of Little Falls, Respondent.

Decided May 9, 2006

Trevett v City of Little Falls, 24 AD3d 1197, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Michael A. Castle, Herkimer (Scott H. Oberman of counsel), for appellant.

Cramer, Smith & Leach, P.C., Syracuse (Ralph S. Alexander of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff was injured while attempting a lay up when he collided in mid-air with a pole supporting a basketball backboard and rim. The Appellate Division correctly held that the proximity of the pole to the court was open and obvious, and thus the risk of collision with the [*2]pole was inherent in playing on that court. Therefore, the Appellate Division properly dismissed the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had assumed the risk of injury (see Sykes v County of Erie, 94 NY2d 912 [2000]; Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471 [1997]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.