Fleming v Sarva
2006 NY Slip Op 03716
Decided on May 9, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 9, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P.
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER

2005-00029

[*1]Farrell M. Fleming, et al., respondents,

v

Ramesh Sarva, et al., appellants. (Index No. 18170/01)





Bernard Ouziel, Great Neck, N.Y., for appellants.
Sordi & Sordi, LLP, Glen Cove, N.Y. (Nicholas A. Sordi, Jr.,
of counsel), for respondents.

Appeal by the defendants, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J.), dated November 15, 2004.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Austin in the Supreme Court.
GOLDSTEIN, J.P., LUCIANO, RIVERA and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.