People v Baldares-Lima
2006 NY Slip Op 03911
Decided on May 16, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 16, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
STEPHEN G. CRANE
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
PETER B. SKELOS
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER

2004-09072

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Diego Baldares-Lima, appellant. (Ind. No. 04-00306)





Michele Marte-Indzonka, Newburgh, N.Y., for appellant.
Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Daniel
M. Reback of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered September 29, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that deportation was a possible consequence of his conviction is without merit (see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404; People v Sandher, 12 AD3d 464, 465).
SCHMIDT, J.P., CRANE, KRAUSMAN, SKELOS and LUNN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.