Whelan v Longo
2006 NY Slip Op 06375 [7 NY3d 821]
September 12, 2006
Court of Appeals
As corrected through Wednesday, November 08, 2006


[*1]
Stacey Whelan, Appellant,
v
Lance Longo, Respondent.

Decided September 12, 2006

Whelan v Longo, 23 AD3d 459, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Jeffrey Levitt, Amityville, for appellant.

Paul J. Israelson, Plainview, for respondent.

{**7 NY3d at 822}OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff knew or should have known of the facts allegedly giving rise to the legal malpractice cause of action at the time she filed her February 2002 bankruptcy petition (see Dynamics Corp. of Am. v Marine Midland Bank-N.Y., 69 NY2d 191 [1987]). Thus, plaintiff's failure to disclose that cause of action in her bankruptcy petition deprived her of the legal capacity to sue in this action (id.).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.