Matter of Kaiser v Orange County Dept. of Social Servs.
2006 NYSlipOp 08247
November 14, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007


In the Matter of Joan Kaiser, Appellant,
v
Orange County Department of Social Services et al., Respondents.

[*1]In a guardianship proceeding, the petitioner maternal grandmother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Klein, J.), dated November 14, 2005, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner contends that the Family Court erroneously considered certain hearsay testimony at the guardianship hearing. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review since the petitioner did not object to admission of the testimony at any time during the hearing (see Matter of Diaz v Santiago, 8 AD3d 562, 563 [2004]). In any event, even in view of the hearsay nature of the testimony, the Family Court properly concluded that it was in the child's best interest to deny the petition by the maternal grandmother for guardianship of the child (see SCPA 1707). There is a sound and substantial basis in the record for the Family Court's determination. Santucci, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.