People v Jaquez
2006 NYSlipOp 08264
November 14, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jose Jaquez, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 13, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to four indeterminate terms of one to three years imprisonment under counts one through four of the indictment, all the sentences to run consecutively.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by directing that the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant's convictions under counts one and two of the indictment run concurrently with each other, the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant's convictions under counts three and four of the indictment run concurrently with each other, and the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant's convictions under counts one and two of the indictment run consecutively with the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant's convictions under counts three and four of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed is excessive to the extent indicated herein.

The defendant's remaining contention does not require reversal. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.