People v Bald
2006 NYSlipOp 08583
November 17, 2006
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Scott Bald, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph S. Forma, J.), rendered July 20, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid and thus that his contention concerning the severity of his sentence is properly before us. "Because defendant has completed serving the sentence imposed, his contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe has been rendered moot" (People v Benson, 6 AD3d 1173, 1173 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 636 [2004]; see People v Parente, 4 AD3d 793 [2004]; People v James, 269 AD2d 845, 846 [2000]), and we therefore need not reach defendant's contention with respect to the alleged invalidity of the waiver of the right to appeal. Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.