People v Faustin
2006 NYSlipOp 09273
December 5, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jean Faustin, Appellant.

[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered April 29, 2002, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant claims that he was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct during trial and on summation. However, except for his claims that the prosecutor on summation misstated the defense counsel's closing argument and attacked the defense counsel's integrity, his contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951, 953 [1981]). In any event, his claims are without merit and any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242 [1975]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.