People v Juarbe
2007 NYSlipOp 00123
January 9, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 14, 2007


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Anthony Juarbe, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Warren S. Landau of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Anne Crick of counsel; Rian Silverman on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated January 21, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant's sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court's determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender based upon the existence of a "presumptive override" factor, namely, that the defendant had "a prior felony conviction for a sex crime" is supported by clear and convincing evidence and thus, should not be disturbed (see People v Page, 32 AD3d 1352 [2006]; People v Clinkscales, 18 AD3d 726 [2005]; People v Boan, 11 AD3d 956 [2004]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Miller, J.P., Rivera, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.