Cai Qiang Li v Yang
2007 NYSlipOp 00253
January 16, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 14, 2007


Cai Qiang Li et al., Appellants,
v
Edward C. Yang et al., Respondents.

[*1]Jack Baum, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Richard E. Lerner of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rosenberg, J.), dated October 17, 2005, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. In opposition, the affidavit of the plaintiffs' expert failed to raise a triable issue of fact, as it contained only conclusory and unsupported allegations (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.