People v Fisher
2007 NYSlipOp 00619
January 30, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 14, 2007


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Ricardo S. Fisher, Appellant.

[*1]Kent V. Moston, Hempstead, N.Y. (Jeremy L. Goldberg and Tammy Feman of counsel; Nathan Kennedy on the brief), for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Margaret E. Mainusch of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Gulotta, J.), dated November 15, 2004, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the County Court's determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender, and thus it will not be disturbed on appeal (see People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404 [2005]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]; People v Brown, 7 AD3d 595 [2004]). There is no merit to the defendant's contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from this risk level (see People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515 [2006]; People v Ventura, 24 AD3d 527 [2005]; People v Dexter, 21 AD3d 403 [2005]).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.