Stern v New York City Commn. on Human Rights
2007 NYSlipOp 01982
March 13, 2007
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 9, 2007


Frank Stern, Appellant,
v
New York City Commission on Human Rights, Respondent.

[*1]Frank Stern, New York, appellant pro se.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Drake A. Colley of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered January 6, 2006, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought to set aside a determination of the Human Rights Commission, dated July 1, 2005, finding that there was no probable cause for petitioner's complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is within the discretion of the respondent to decide how to conduct its investigations (see Matter of Cornelius v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 286 AD2d 329 [2001]), and we find that it conducted a sufficient investigation and provided petitioner with a full and fair opportunity to present his claim. Petitioner nonetheless failed to set forth evidence to support a finding of probable cause for his complaint alleging discrimination by reason of his sexual orientation. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the Department of Finance and its former chief administrative law judge were not necessary parties to this proceeding challenging respondent Commission's finding of no probable cause. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.