Brooks v Judlau Contr., Inc.
2007 NYSlipOp 02868
April 3, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, June 6, 2007


Stephen J. Brooks et al., Plaintiffs,
v
Judlau Contracting, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Thunderbird Constructors, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[*1]Biedermann, Hoenig, Massamillo & Ruff, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Eugene F. Massamillo and Joshua Bruch of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent.

Cerussi & Spring, White Plains, N.Y. (Peter Riggs of counsel), for third-party defendant-appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated October 2, 2001, which denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the third-party claim for contractual indemnification.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]; Brooks v Judlau Contr., Inc., 39 AD3d 447 [2007] [decided herewith]). Crane, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Fisher, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.