Matter of Marino v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.
2007 NYSlipOp 05191
June 14, 2007
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 15, 2007


In the Matter of Leo A. Marino, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[*1]Leo A. Marino, Collins, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

The misbehavior report, together with the positive urinalysis test results, supporting documentation and testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Costner v Goord, 31 AD3d 1030, 1030 [2006]; Matter of Molina v Selsky, 21 AD3d 1238, 1238-1239 [2005]). Petitioner's claim that the misbehavior report was written in retaliation for his filing of a lawsuit against a correction official presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Hoover v Goord, 38 AD3d 1069 [2007]; Matter of Dawkins v Selsky, 278 AD2d 649, 649 [2000]). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, there is no indication in the record that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Cayenne v Goord, 16 AD3d 782, 783-784 [2005]). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and are unpersuasive.[*2]

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.