Goldsmith Motors Corp. v Chemical Bank
2007 NYSlipOp 05464
June 19, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 15, 2007


Goldsmith Motors Corp., Respondent,
v
Chemical Bank, Appellant.

[*1]Tromello, McDonnell & Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (James S. Kehoe of counsel), for appellant.

Steven R. Haffner, Bayside, N.Y., for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for libel arising out of the wrongful dishonor of checks, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated June 28, 2004, which, inter alia, denied those branches of its cross motion which were to dismiss the complaint based on spoliation of evidence or, in the alternative, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied, in effect, without prejudice to renewal before the trial court, that branch of its cross motion which was to preclude the plaintiff from calling its expert witness to testify at trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]; Goldsmith Motors Corp. v Chemical Bank, 41 AD3d 648 [2007]). Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Covello and Carni, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.