People v Liner
2007 NYSlipOp 05779
July 2, 2007
Court of Appeals
As corrected through Wednesday, September 5, 2007


[*1]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Joshua Liner, Appellant.

Argued June 6, 2007; decided July 2, 2007

People v Liner, 33 AD3d 479, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Legal Aid Society, New York City (Natalie Rea and Steven Banks of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York City (Gary S. Snitow and David M. Cohn of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of the crimes of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny, and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree for [*2]stealing merchandise at a Duane Reade store. At trial, the People introduced into evidence two trespass notices revoking defendant's privilege to enter Duane Reade stores. Because defendant failed to assert at the time of the trial that the admission of the notices violated his right of confrontation, the issue is not preserved for our review (see generally People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.