Schill v Schill
2007 NYSlipOp 06033
July 10, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 12, 2007


Alan Schill, Appellant,
v
Mary Ann Schill, Respondent.

[*1]Cohen & Prizer, Carle Place, N.Y. (Linda A. Prizer of counsel), for appellant.

Brettschneider & Brettschneider, Huntington, N.Y. (Michael C. Catalanotto of counsel), for respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated August 6, 1999, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J.) dated May 22, 2006, as denied his motion, in effect, to resettle the substantive or decretal provisions of an order dated March 4, 2002.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The order appealed from denied, inter alia, the plaintiff's motion, which was denominated as one to modify and amend an order dated March 4, 2002, but was actually one to resettle the substantive or decretal provisions of the order. The appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying resettlement of the substantive or decretal provisions of a prior order (see Connolly v Connolly, 282 AD2d 703 [2001]; Scopelliti v Scopelliti, 250 AD2d 752 [1998]). Miller, J.P., Crane, Ritter and Lifson, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.