Matter of Smith v Goord
2007 NYSlipOp 06199
July 26, 2007
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 12, 2007


In the Matter of Preston A. Smith, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[*1]Preston A. Smith, Malone, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered October 11, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review four determinations of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, initiated this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging four separate disciplinary determinations rendered against him. However, inasmuch as the controlling four-month statute of limitations (see CPLR 217 [1]) had long since expired with respect to each of the final determinations by the time that petitioner commenced this proceeding, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as untimely (see Matter of Morales v Selsky, 288 AD2d 805, 806 [2001]). In view of our disposition, we need not address the remaining contentions set forth in petitioner's brief.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.