| Matter of Joseph S. |
| 2007 NYSlipOp 06363 |
| August 7, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| In the Matter of Joseph S. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Laura S., Appellant. |
—[*1] Christine Malafi, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Keith R. McHugh of counsel), for respondent. Robert C. Mitchell, Central Islip, N.Y. (John B. Belmonte of counsel), Law Guardian.
In a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Budd, J.), dated October 19, 2006, as, after a hearing, directed that the subject child be temporarily removed from her physical custody, and (2) from a temporary order of protection of the same court also dated October 19, 2006, which prohibited her from having any contact with the subject child except for visitation supervised by the Suffolk County Department of Social Services, or a person approved by the Suffolk County Department of Social Services, for a period of one year.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
Ordered that the temporary order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence at the hearing provided a sound and substantial basis for the Family [*2]Court's determination that removal of the subject child from the physical custody of the mother was necessary to avoid imminent risk to the child's health (see Family Ct Act § 1027 [a], [b] [i]). That evidence included testimony relating to the injury to the child's forehead, the history of the usage of excessive corporal punishment, and the inability of the mother to protect the child from the father. Further, the court properly determined that reasonable efforts had been made by the Suffolk County Department of Social Services (hereinafter DSS) to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the home, and that continuation in the mother's physical custody would be contrary to the best interests of the child (see Family Ct Act § 1027 [b] [i]).
We perceive no basis upon which to disturb the temporary order of protection prohibiting the mother from having any contact with the subject child except for visitation supervised by the DSS, or a person approved by the DSS, for a period of one year. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Dillon and Carni, JJ., concur.