People v Yarborough
2007 NY Slip Op 06968 [43 AD3d 1129]
September 25, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, November 7, 2007


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Maurice Yarborough, Appellant.

[*1]Stephen J. Pittari, White Plains, N.Y. (David B. Weisfuse of counsel), for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Maria I. Wagner, Richard LongworthHecht, and Anthony J. Servino of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni,J.), entered July 25, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offenderpursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the County Court's determination to designate him alevel three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence, based on the facts andadmissions contained in the presentence investigation report, the case summary, and the riskassessment instrument of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (see Correction Law§ 168-n; People v Arnold, 35AD3d 827 [2006]; People vGrimmett, 29 AD3d 766, 767 [2006]; cf. People v Hines, 24 AD3d 524, 525 [2005]; People v Davis, 21 AD3d 590, 592[2005]). Crane, J.P., Lifson, Carni and Balkin, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.