People v Lacewell
2007 NY Slip Op 07865 [44 AD3d 876]
October 16, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 12, 2007


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Timothy Lacewell, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Tonya Plank of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart andJames Ching of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney,J.), rendered April 13, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance inthe fourth degree, assault in the second degree, assault in the third degree, and resisting arrest,upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court erred in charging the jury that it might infer a"consciousness of guilt" from a threat that he made at a police station, soon after his arrest.However, any error in giving the charge was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence ofthe defendant's guilt, and no significant probability that the error contributed to his convictions(see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]; cf. People v Heman, 198AD2d 434, 435 [1993]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85-86[1982]). Rivera, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.