Matter of Pagan v Selsky
2007 NY Slip Op 09147 [45 AD3d 1120]
November 21, 2007
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008


In the Matter of Omar Pagan, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, asDirector of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs,Respondent.

[*1]Omar Pagan, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), forrespondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the SupremeCourt, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of CorrectionalServices which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with illicit drug use. Following atier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of that charge. After exhausting hisadministrative remedies, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging thedetermination.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and hearing testimonyprovide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Hoover v Goord, 38 AD3d 1069, 1070 [2007], lvdenied 8 NY3d 816 [2007]; Matterof Silverstein v Selsky, 32 AD3d 1100, 1100 [2006]). Petitioner's exculpatoryexplanations attempting to undermine and/or explain away the positive drug test createdcredibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Lee v Goord, 36 AD3d 1176, 1177 [2007]). As forpetitioner's claims of hearing officer bias and inadequate employee assistance, they have not beenpreserved for our review (see Matter of Torres v Coombe, 234 AD2d 710, 710 [1996]).In any event, those claims, along with petitioner's remaining contentions, have been examinedand found to be unavailing.[*2]

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur.Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.