Matter of Madison UU.
2007 NY Slip Op 09473 [45 AD3d 1225]
November 29, 2007
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008


In the Matter of Madison UU. and Another, Children Alleged to beNeglected. Sullivan County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Rebecca UU.,Respondent.

[*1]Michael C. Ross, Sullivan County Department of Family Services, Monticello, forappellant.

Isabelle Rawich, South Fallsburg, for respondent.

Gail B. Rubenfeld, Law Guardian, Monticello.

Crew III, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County (Ledina, J.),entered February 9, 2007, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant toFamily Ct Act article 10, to adjudicate respondent's children to be neglected.

Respondent is the biological mother of two children, Madison (born in 2003) and Nicholas(2006). In January 2006, when Nicholas was approximately one week old, authorities weresummoned to respondent's residence in response to a complaint that Nicholas had been injuredduring the course of an altercation between respondent and Nicholas's father. Following aninvestigation, petitioner commenced the instant proceeding seeking to adjudicate respondent'schildren to be neglected. A fact-finding hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which Family Courtdismissed petitioner's application, finding that petitioner failed to tender sufficient proof todemonstrate that respondent indeed neglected her children. This appeal by petitioner ensued.

We affirm. In light of the conflicting evidence regarding the manner in which Nicholas [*2]was injured, together with the minor nature of the injury sustained,we decline to disturb Family Court's determination that the record as a whole is insufficient tosupport a finding of neglect within the meaning of Family Ct Act § 1012 (f) (i). As there isinsufficient proof of neglect as to Nicholas, it necessarily follows that there can be no finding ofderivative neglect as to Madison.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed,without costs.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.