Gomez v 2355 Eighth Ave., LLC
2007 NY Slip Op 09498 [45 AD3d 493]
November 29, 2007
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008


Orsines Gomez, Respondent,
v
2355 Eighth Avenue, LLC,Appellant.

[*1]Doyle & Broumand, LLP, Bronx (Michael B. Doyle of counsel), for appellant.

Friedman, Friedman, Chiaravalloti & Giannini, New York City (A. Joseph Giannini ofcounsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered on or about July 10,2006, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's cross motionfor summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim,unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was injured when a temporary platform of plywood pieces laid across floor beamsgave way under his weight, dropping him between the beams to shoulder level, with his feetdangling in the air above the basement floor. His uncontroverted deposition testimonyestablished defendant's liability for providing an unsafe, elevated device within the meaning ofsection 240 (1) (see Campisi v Epos Contr. Corp., 299 AD2d 4 [2002]; Becerra v Cityof New York, 261 AD2d 188 [1999]). The fact that the job site supervisor, who did notwitness the accident, did not see the hazardous condition after the accident does not warrantdenial of the cross motion. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Nardelli, Buckley, Gonzalez andSweeny, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.